422 S.E.2d 98 (S.C. 1992), 23703, Raino v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.

Citation: 422 S.E.2d 98, 309 S.C. 255

Opinion Judge: MOORE, Justice:

Party Name: Cynthia RAINO, Respondent, v. GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY, Lee Tire Company, Stokes Honda of Beaufort, Inc., and Barnard Tire Company, Defendants, Of Whom Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company and Lee Tire Company are Appellants.

Attorney: Charles E. Carpenter, Jr., and Deborah L. Harrison, both of Richardson, Plowden, Grier & Howser, Columbia, and Robert H. Hood and Carl E. Pierce, II, both of Hood Law Firm, Charleston, for appellants. John E. Parker, of Peters, Murdaugh, Parker, Eltzroth & Detrick, Hampton, and A. Parker Barnes, ...

Case Date: August 31, 1992

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

422 S.E.2d 98 (S.C. 1992), 23703, Raino v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 100 S.E.2d 534 (S.C. 1957), 17351, Benton v. Pellum
South Carolina - 136 S.E.2d 286 (S.C. 1964), 18209, Watson v. Wilkinson Trucking Co.
South Carolina - 345 S.E.2d 728 (S.C. 1986), 22560, Holloman v. McAllister
South Carolina - 362 S.E.2d 16 (S.C. 1987), 22792, Livingston v. Noland Corp.
South Carolina - 376 S.E.2d 773 (S.C. 1989), 22942, State v. Williams

See all quotations