42 So. 81 (Fla. 1906), Mugge v. Tampa Waterworks Co.

Citation: 42 So. 81, 52 Fla. 371

Opinion Judge: HOCKER, J. (after stating the facts).

Party Name: MUGGE v. TAMPA WATERWORKS CO.

Attorney: [52 Fla. 376]Lunsford & Dickenson, for plaintiff in error. Sparkman & Carter and P. O. Knight, for defendant in error. (2) It shows there has been no breach of the contract between the city and the defendant. On a hearing the demurrer was sustained, and a judgment rendered dismissing the suit. Th...

Case Date: July 10, 1906

Court: Florida Supreme Court