42 S.E. 1032 (Ga. 1902), City of Rome v. Suddeth

Citation: 42 S.E. 1032, 116 Ga. 649

Opinion Judge: CANDLER, J.

Party Name: CITY OF ROME v. SUDDETH.

Attorney: Halsted Smith, for plaintiff in error. Seaborn & Barry Wright, for defendant in error.

Judge Panel: There is nothing in the declaration in the present case that goes to show that the plaintiff is entitled to recover. The charge of negligence made against the municipal authorities is too vague and general to constitute a basis of recovery against the city. For these reasons, we hold that the cou...

Case Date: December 10, 1902

Court: Georgia Supreme Court