42 Cal.3d 1051, 24860, Pool v. City of Oakland

Citation: 42 Cal.3d 1051, 232 Cal.Rptr. 528, 728 P.2d 1163

Opinion Judge: [10] Bird

Party Name: Pool v. City of Oakland

Attorney: [7] Richard E. Winnie, City Attorney, Mark Shragge, Deputy City Attorney, David Weingard, Mintz, Giller, Himmelman & Mintz, David A. Himmelman and David S. Honler for Defendants and Appellants. [8] James E. Cox and Dan L. Garrett, Jr., for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: Monday December 29, 1986

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

42 Cal.3d 1051, 24860, Pool v. City of Oakland

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 339 U.S. 1 (1950), 302, District of Columbia v. Little
Arizona - 680 P.2d 807 (Ariz. 1984), 16560, Gortarez By and Through Gortarez v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc.
California - 134 Cal. 103, L. A. 817, Miller v. Fano
California - 23 Cal.2d 840, 5637, Valencia v. Shell Oil Co.
California - 26 Cal.2d 213, 19154, Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.

See all quotations