42 Cal.2d 110, 22321, City of San Diego v. Southern Etc. Tel. Corp.

Citation: 42 Cal.2d 110, 266 P.2d 14

Opinion Judge: [11] Traynor

Party Name: City of San Diego v. Southern Etc. Tel. Corp.

Attorney: [7] J. F. DuPaul, City Attorney, Shelley J. Higgins, Assistant City Attorney and T. B. Cosgrove for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] John A. Sutro, Francis N. Marshall, Noble K. Gregory, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, Oscar Lawler, Leslie C. Tupper and Lawler, Felix & Hall for Defendant and Appellant. [...

Case Date: January 22, 1954

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

42 Cal.2d 110, 22321, City of San Diego v. Southern Etc. Tel. Corp.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 280 U.S. 338 (1930), 254, New Jersey Bell Telephone Company v. State Board of Taxes & Assessments
California - 157 Cal. 781, L. A. 2499, City of Pasadena (a Municipal Corp.) v. Superior Court (Hon. Walter Bordwell, Judge)
California - 161 Cal. 265, L. A. 2557, Sunset Telephone v. City of Pasadena (A Municipal Corporation)
California - 188 Cal. 664, Sac. 3136, Tulare County v. City of Dinuba
California - 197 Cal. 649, S. F. 11700, Tulare Irr. Dist. v. Superior Court

See all quotations