414 P.2d 625 (Wash. 1966), 38093, Workman v. Marshall
Citation:
414 P.2d 625, 68 Wn.2d 578
Opinion Judge:
ROSELLINI, Chief Justice. Before When a court is reviewing the propriety of an award, the question is not whether, in its judgment, the amount of damages the court would have awarded coincides with that awarded by the jury The fact that the court would have assessed a less or larger amount than the jury is not a ground to interfere with the verdict
Party Name:
Judith A. WORKMAN, a minor, by her Guardian ad Litem, Hazel Workman, Appellant, v. Judith MARSHALL, and Robert Marshall and Lorraine Marshall, husband and wife, Respondents.
Attorney:
Murray, Scott, McGavick & Graves, Edward M. Lane, Tacoma, for appellant. , Davies, Pearson, Anderson & Pearson, Vernon R. Pearson, Tacoma, for respondents., ROSELLINI, Chief Justice., The minor plaintiff (hereafter referred to as the plaintiff) was struck, while in a marked crosswalk, by an autom...
Judge Panel:
DONWORTH, WEAVER, and FINLEY, JJ., and LANGENBACH, J. pro tem., concur.
