41 Cal.App.3d 1035, 13359, Roam v. Koop

Citation: 41 Cal.App.3d 1035, 116 Cal.Rptr. 539

Opinion Judge: [9] The Court

Party Name: Roam v. Koop

Attorney: [7] Iverson, Yoakum, Papiano & Hatch, Leonard M. Amato and E. Broox Randall for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Beam, Duffy & Ure and Byron J. Beam for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: September 25, 1974

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

41 Cal.App.3d 1035, 13359, Roam v. Koop

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 191 Cal. 129, S. F. 10578, Mansfield v. Pickwick Stages, Northern Division, Inc.
California - 198 Cal. 196, Sac. 3523, Fair Oaks Bank v. Johnson
California - 35 Cal.2d 713, 21075, Steiner v. Rowley
California - 37 Cal.2d 445, 21141, Williams v. Marshall
California - 38 Cal.2d 386, 21515, Estrada v. Alvarez

See all quotations