409 S.E.2d 35 (Ga. 1991), S91G0422, Marta v. Gomez

Citation: 409 S.E.2d 35, 261 Ga. 617

Opinion Judge: BENHAM, Justice

Party Name: MARTA et al. v. GOMEZ et al.

Attorney: Charles N. Pursley, Jr., Pursley, Howell, Lowery & Meeks, John T. Ruff, Neely & Player, Atlanta, for MARTA et al., William J. McKenney, David M. Kupsky, McKenney & Froelich, Atlanta, for Gomez et al. Pursley, Howell, Lowery & Meeks, Charles N. Pursley, Jr., Neely & Player, John T. Ruff, for appe...

Case Date: October 03, 1991

Court: Georgia Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

409 S.E.2d 35 (Ga. 1991), S91G0422, Marta v. Gomez

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 42 S.E. 315 (Ga. 1902), Georgia R. & Banking Co. v. Maddox
Georgia - 95 S.E. 962 (Ga. 1918), 681, Brown v. City of East Point
Georgia - 249 S.E.2d 235 (Ga. 1978), 33902, Duffield v. Dekalb County
Georgia - 273 S.E.2d 859 (Ga. 1981), 36853, Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. Trussell
Georgia - 399 S.E.2d 536 (Ga.App. 1990), A90A0960, Gomez v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority