40 S.E. 133 (S.C. 1901), Doolittle v. Southern Ry. Co.

Citation: 40 S.E. 133, 62 S.C. 130

Opinion Judge: GARY, A. J. PER CURIAM.

Party Name: DOOLITTLE v. SOUTHERN RY. CO.

Attorney: B. L. Abney, E. M. Thomson, and Sheppard Bros., for appellant. Thurmond & Calhoun and Croft & Tillman, for appellee. made it necessary that he should have special assistance, and he took the precaution to notify the defendant of this fact. This made it the

Case Date: August 05, 1901

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

40 S.E. 133 (S.C. 1901), Doolittle v. Southern Ry. Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 20 S.E. 65 (Ga. 1894), Leonard v. Owen
South Carolina - 25 S.C. 128 (S.C. 1886), Boatwright v. Northeastern R. Co.
South Carolina - 19 S.E. 951 (S.C. 1894), Madden v. Port Royal & W.C. Ry. Co.
South Carolina - 28 S.E. 303 (S.C. 1897), Martin v. Southern Ry. Co.
South Carolina - 29 S.E. 905 (S.C. 1898), Mack v. South-Bound R. Co.

See all quotations