40 P.2d 991 (Wash. 1935), 24970, O'Connell v. Home Oil Co.

Citation: 40 P.2d 991, 180 Wash. 461

Opinion Judge: STEINERT, Justice.

Party Name: O'CONNELL v. HOME OIL CO. et al.

Attorney: Padden & Moriarty and Earl F. Requa, all of Seattle, for appellant. Whittemore & Truscott and Arthur L. Haugan, all of Seattle, for respondents.

Judge Panel: BEALS, HOLCOMB, and BLAKE, JJ., concur.

Case Date: January 25, 1935

Court: Washington Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

40 P.2d 991 (Wash. 1935), 24970, O'Connell v. Home Oil Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 117 Cal. 257, L. A. 225, Niosi v. Empire Steam Laundry
California - 107 Cal.App. 71, Civ. 7013, Comstock v. Morse
Texas - 272 S.W. 256 (Tex.Civ.App. 1925), 200, Suttle v. Texas Electric Ry.
Washington - 118 P. 916 (Wash. 1911), Cheichi v. Northern P. Ry. Co.
Washington - 119 P. 810 (Wash. 1911), Wiles v. Northern P. Ry. Co.

See all quotations