40 N.W. 398 (Wis. 1888), Smith v. Champagne

Citation: 40 N.W. 398, 72 Wis. 480

Opinion Judge: HARLOW S. ORTON, J.

Party Name: SMITH, Appellant, v. CHAMPAGNE and another, Respondents

Attorney: For the appellant there was a brief by Cate, Jones & Sanborn, and oral argument by D. Lloyd Jones. For the respondents there was a brief by Bump & Hetzel, and oral argument by E. L. Bump.

Case Date: Thursday November 08, 1888

Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court