40 N.W. 391 (Wis. 1888), Soquet v. State

Citation: 40 N.W. 391, 72 Wis. 659

Opinion Judge: HARLOW S. ORTON, J.

Party Name: SOQUET, Plaintiff in error, v. THE STATE, Defendant in error

Attorney: For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by Hudd & Wigman, and oral argument by J. H. M. Wigman. For the defendant in error there was a brief by the Attorney General and L. K. Luse, Assistant Attorney General, and Chas. E. Vroman, special counsel, and the cause was argued orally by Mr. Vroman...

Case Date: Thursday November 08, 1888

Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court