40 Cal.3d 306, 32060, Foster v. Xerox Corp.

Citation: 40 Cal.3d 306, 219 Cal.Rptr. 485, 707 P.2d 858

Opinion Judge: [10] Mosk

Party Name: Foster v. Xerox Corp.

Attorney: [7] Herbert E. Selwyn for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Latham & Watkins, Ernest J. Getto and Meredith A. Riekse for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: November 04, 1985

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

40 Cal.3d 306, 32060, Foster v. Xerox Corp.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 27 Cal.2d 349, 19172, Herzog v. Capital Co.
California - 18 Cal.3d 335, 30465, Goodman v. Kennedy
California - 21 Cal.3d 671, 30636, Sun ' Sand, Inc. v. United California Bank
California - 27 Cal.3d 465, 24086, Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior Court
California - 47 Cal.App.3d 760, 36122, Magliulo v. Superior Court