40 Cal.2d 224, 22038, Gill v. Hearst Publishing Co.

Citation: 40 Cal.2d 224, 253 P.2d 441

Opinion Judge: [11] Spence

Party Name: Gill v. Hearst Publishing Co.

Attorney: [7] Shacknove & Goldman and Ben F. Goldman, Jr., for Appellants. [8] Flint & MacKay and Arch R. Tuthill for Respondents. [9] Loeb & Loeb; Lawler, Felix & Hall; Price, MacDonald & Knox; John Hamlyn; Cosgrove, Cramer, Diether & Rindge, and Binford & Binford as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondents.

Case Date: Tuesday February 17, 1953

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

40 Cal.2d 224, 22038, Gill v. Hearst Publishing Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 303 U.S. 444 (1938), 391, Lovell v. City of Griffin
Federal Cases - 333 U.S. 507 (1948), 3, Winters v. New York
Federal Cases - 334 U.S. 131 (1948), 79, United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.
Arizona - 169 P.2d 850 (Ariz. 1946), 4836, Kresse v. Ryerson
California - 20 Cal.2d 713, 16648, Wennerholm v. Stanford Univ. Sch. of Med.

See all quotations