4 S.E.2d 922 (Ga.App. 1939), 27528, Driver v. State

Citation: 4 S.E.2d 922, 60 Ga.App. 719

Party Name: DRIVER v. STATE.

Attorney: In prosecution under statute relating to fraudulent conversion of goods entrusted to store employees, an indictment alleging that one of defendants, a drug store cashier, was customarily entrusted with money belonging to store and that while so entrusted she and other defendants converted money t...

Case Date: Monday October 09, 1939

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

4 S.E.2d 922 (Ga.App. 1939), 27528, Driver v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 112 S.E. 165 (Ga.App. 1922), 13003, Burgess v. Murphey
Georgia - 63 S.E. 536 (Ga.App. 1909), 1,582, Lanier v. State
Georgia - 68 S.E. 849 (Ga.App. 1910), 2,252, Cabaniss v. State
Georgia - 70 S.E. 978 (Ga.App. 1911), 3,142, Gazaway v. State
Georgia - 4 S.E.2d 918 (Ga.App. 1939), 27589, Rogers v. State