397 A.2d 1367 (Conn. 1978), Xerox Corp. v. Board of Tax Review of City of Hartford

Citation: 397 A.2d 1367, 175 Conn. 301

Opinion Judge: BOGDANSKI, J.

Party Name: XEROX CORPORATION v. BOARD OF TAX REVIEW OF the CITY OF HARTFORD.

Attorney: Harry L. Nair and Valentine J. Sacco, Hartford, for appellant (plaintiff)., Richard M. Cosgrove, Acting Corp. Counsel, Hartford, for appellee (defendant). Harry L. Nair and Valentine J. Sacco, for the appellant (plaintiff). Richard M. Cosgrove, acting corporation counsel, for the appellee (defen...

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other judges concurred. Before COTTER, C J, and LOISELLE, BOGDANSKI, LONGO and HEALEY

Case Date: June 20, 1978

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

397 A.2d 1367 (Conn. 1978), Xerox Corp. v. Board of Tax Review of City of Hartford

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 122 A. 91 (Conn. 1923), Underwood Typewriter Co. v. City of Hartford
Connecticut - 120 A.2d 77 (Conn. 1956), Sibley v. Town of Middlefield
Connecticut - 216 A.2d 439 (Conn. 1966), Bridgeport Gas Co. v. Town of Stratford
Connecticut - 224 A.2d 744 (Conn. 1966), State v. Vars
Connecticut - 230 A.2d 9 (Conn. 1967), Stanley Works v. New Britain Redevelopment Agency

See all quotations