397 A.2d 1349 (Conn. 1978), Fishman v. Urban Redevelopment Commission of City of Stamford

Citation: 397 A.2d 1349, 175 Conn. 265

Opinion Judge: COTTER, J.

Party Name: Joseph FISHMAN v. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF the CITY OF STAMFORD.

Attorney: John J. Graubard, Stamford, with whom, on the brief, was Sydney C. Kweskin, Stamford, for appellant (plaintiff)., Robert M. Wechsler, Stamford, with whom on the brief, was James V. Minor, Stamford, for appellee (defendant). John J. Graubard, with whom, on the brief, was Sydney C. Kweskin, for th...

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other judges concurred. Before COTTER, LOISELLE, BOGDANSKI, LONGO and HEALEY

Case Date: June 06, 1978

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

397 A.2d 1349 (Conn. 1978), Fishman v. Urban Redevelopment Commission of City of Stamford

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 177 A.2d 673 (Conn. 1962), Salgreen Realty Co. v. Ives
Connecticut - 204 A.2d 833 (Conn. 1964), Research Associates, Inc. v. New Haven Redevelopment Agency
Connecticut - 229 A.2d 352 (Conn. 1967), Waesche v. Redevelopment Agency of City of New London
Connecticut - 230 A.2d 9 (Conn. 1967), Stanley Works v. New Britain Redevelopment Agency
Connecticut - 233 A.2d 1 (Conn. 1967), Redevelopment Agency of City of Norwalk v. Norwalk Aluminum Foundry Corp.

See all quotations