39 A.2d 877 (Conn. 1944), Tully v. Demir

Citation: 39 A.2d 877, 131 Conn. 330

Opinion Judge: JENNINGS, Judge.

Party Name: TULLY v. DEMIR et al.

Attorney: Harrison D. Schofield and John W. Joy, both of Hartford, for appellants (defendants Demir and Querim). William L. Hadden, of New Haven (Walter T. Faulkner, Daniel Pouzzner, and Clarence A. Hadden, all of New Haven, on the brief), for appellant (defendant Musante, Berman & Steinberg Co., Inc.). Wi...

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other Judges concurred. Before MALTBIE, C.J., and BROWN, JENNINGS, ELLS, and DICKENSON, JJ.

Case Date: Wednesday November 08, 1944

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

39 A.2d 877 (Conn. 1944), Tully v. Demir

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 119 A. 214 (Conn. 1922), Seabridge v. Poli
Connecticut - 172 A. 218 (Conn. 1934), Martin v. Stamford Gas & Elec. Co.
Connecticut - 187 A. 29 (Conn. 1936), Campus v. McElligott
Connecticut - 66 A. 509 (Conn. 1907), Houghton v. City of New Haven
Connecticut - 39 A.2d 892 (Conn. 1944), Carroll v. Westport Sanitarium