38 Cal.App.4th 1609, E012228, Barthelemy v. Chino Basin Mun. Water Dist.

Citation: 38 Cal.App.4th 1609, 45 Cal.Rptr.2d 688

Opinion Judge: [11] Richli

Party Name: Barthelemy v. Chino Basin Mun. Water Dist.

Attorney: [7] Bright and Brown, John Quirk, Holley & Galen, Debra Burchard Coffeen and A. Steven Brown for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin, Thomas L. Woodruff, Thomas F. Nixon, and Robert W. Lucas for Defendant and Respondent and for Real Party in Interest and Respondent. [9] No ...

Case Date: October 04, 1995

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

38 Cal.App.4th 1609, E012228, Barthelemy v. Chino Basin Mun. Water Dist.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 47 Cal.3d 376, S001922, Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California
California - 9 Cal.4th 559, S038067, Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior Court
California - 197 Cal.App.3d 241, B020791, No Slo Transit, Inc. v. City of Long Beach
California - 221 Cal.App.3d 692, F011485, Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of Hanford
California - 222 Cal.App.3d 1416, B051842, State of California v. Superior Court

See all quotations