38 A.2d 787 (Conn. 1944), Anderson v. C. E. Hall & Sons, Inc.

Citation: 38 A.2d 787, 131 Conn. 232

Opinion Judge: JENNINGS, Judge.

Party Name: ANDERSON v. C. E. HALL & SONS, Inc. (two cases). HINES v. SAME. LA BRIE v. SAME.

Attorney: Julius B. Schatz and Arthur D. Weinstein, both of Hartford (Edward Seltzer, of Hartford, on the brief), for appellant (defendant). W. Arthur Countryman, Jr., of Hartford, for appellees (plaintiffs Anderson). Ernest W. McCormick, of Hartford, for appellees (plaintiffs Hines and La Brie, administra...

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other Judges concurred. Before MALTBIE, C.J., and BROWN, JENNINGS, ELLS, and DICKENSON, JJ.

Case Date: July 20, 1944

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

38 A.2d 787 (Conn. 1944), Anderson v. C. E. Hall & Sons, Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 145 A. 44 (Conn. 1929), Norwalk Tire & Rubber Co. v. Manufacturers' Cas. Ins. Co.
Connecticut - 147 A. 762 (Conn. 1929), Mahoney v. Beatman
Connecticut - 163 A. 458 (Conn. 1932), Clayton v. Clayton
Connecticut - 15 A.2d 83 (Conn. 1940), Kinderavich v. Palmer
Connecticut - 23 A.2d 512 (Conn. 1941), McDowell v. Federal Tea Co., Inc.

See all quotations