378 P.2d 290 (Wash. 1963), 35736, Wharton v. Department of Labor and Industries

Citation: 378 P.2d 290, 61 Wn.2d 286

Opinion Judge: FINLEY, J. Before The primary issue raised by several assignments of error challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict for the plaintiff considering the evidence, it is well to repeat the applicable rule in considering the sufficiency of the evidence to support a verdict It was stated by the late Judge Olson in Arnold v Sansto

Party Name: Clifford WHARTON, Respondent, v. The DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES of the State of Washington, Appellant.

Attorney: John J. O'Connell, Atty. Gen., Olympia, James E. Nelson, Seattle, for appellant. Walthew, Warner & Keefe, Robert H. Thompson, Seattle, for respondent., BY THE COURT., The defendant, the Department of Lobar and Industries, appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff in an industrial insurance case.

Case Date: Thursday January 24, 1963

Court: Washington Supreme Court