370 A.2d 959 (Conn. 1976), Hamill v. Neikind

Citation: 370 A.2d 959, 171 Conn. 357

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: James HAMILL v. Margaret E. NEIKIND et al.

Attorney: Helen F. Krause, Trumbull, for appellant (plaintiff)., James J. Maher, Bridgeport, with whom, on the brief, were Brian P. Maher and Kevin J. Maher, Bridgeport, for appellees (defendants). Helen F. Krause, for the appellant (plaintiff). James J. Maher, with whom, on the brief, were Brian P. Maher...

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other judges concurred. Before HOUSE, CJAnd COTTER, LOISELLE, BOGDANSKI and LONGO

Case Date: Tuesday August 03, 1976

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

370 A.2d 959 (Conn. 1976), Hamill v. Neikind

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 139 A. 270 (Conn. 1927), Aldrich v. Duggan
Connecticut - 10 A.2d 600 (Conn. 1940), Wray v. Fairfield Amusement Co.
Connecticut - 101 A.2d 500 (Conn. 1953), Felix v. Hall-Brooke Sanitarium
Connecticut - 118 A.2d 798 (Conn. 1955), De Carufel v. Colonial Trust Co.
Connecticut - 197 A.2d 73 (Conn. 1964), Oborski v. New Haven Gas Co.

See all quotations