37 S.E.2d 411 (Ga.App. 1946), 31075, Martin v. State

Citation: 37 S.E.2d 411, 73 Ga.App. 573

Opinion Judge: MacINTYRE, Judge.

Party Name: MARTIN v. STATE.

Attorney: being an essential averment as to this transaction,' make the date in each count essential to identify the particular transaction described in that count., 11. The remarks of the solicitor general were improper, but in view of the corrective measures applied by the court, the refusal to declare a...

Judge Panel: BROYLES, C. J., and GARDNER, J., concur.

Case Date: Wednesday March 06, 1946

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals