37 Cal.App.4th 229, D021247, Smith v. State Bd. of Pharmacy

Citation: 37 Cal.App.4th 229, 43 Cal.Rptr.2d 532

Opinion Judge: [10] Nares

Party Name: Smith v. State Bd. of Pharmacy

Attorney: [7] Sheldon Sherman for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Daniel E Lungren, Attorney General, Ronald Russo, Assistant Attorney General, Anthony M. Summers and Ronald A. Casino, Deputy Attorneys General for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: July 31, 1995

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

37 Cal.App.4th 229, D021247, Smith v. State Bd. of Pharmacy

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 6 Cal.3d 205, 29891, Stearns v. Fair Employment Practice Com.
California - 137 Cal.App.2d 672, 16706, Cooper v. State Board of Equalization
California - 240 Cal.App.2d 254, 22471, Randle v. California State Bd. of Pharmacy
California - 265 Cal.App.2d 179, 31292, Arenstein v. California State Bd. of Pharmacy
California - 125 Cal.App.3d 19, 59716, Vermont & 1 Medical Arts Pharmacy v. Board of Pharmacy

See all quotations