37 Cal.App.3d 92, 13027, Banville v. Schmidt

Citation: 37 Cal.App.3d 92, 112 Cal.Rptr. 126

Opinion Judge: [11] Janes

Party Name: Banville v. Schmidt

Attorney: [7] Gualco, Hummel & Gualco and Allan Melikian for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] McConnell, Backus & Carson, Malcolm L. McConnell and Robert Hoffman for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant. [9] Dahl, Hefner, Stark, Marois & James, Theodore M. Marois, Jr., and Max H. Hoseit for Defendants,...

Case Date: February 04, 1974

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

37 Cal.App.3d 92, 13027, Banville v. Schmidt

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 46 Cal.2d 690, 23409, Primm v. Primm
California - 49 Cal.2d 647, 19757, Biakanja v. Irving
California - 52 Cal.2d 720, 25405, Burdette v. Rollefson Construction Co.
California - 58 Cal.2d 528, 21082, Amen v. Merced County Title Co.
California - 59 Cal.2d 618, 20954, Prentice v. North Am. Title Guaranty Corp., Alameda Division

See all quotations