37 Cal.3d 174, 31484, Barme v. Wood

Citation: 37 Cal.3d 174, 207 Cal.Rptr. 816, 689 P.2d 446

Opinion Judge: [12] Kaus

Party Name: Barme v. Wood

Attorney: [7] Kegel, Tobin & Hamrick, Kegel & Tobin, Clinton M. Hodges and David E. Lister for Intervener and Appellant. [8] Burke, Williams & Sorensen and Brian A. Pierik as Amici Curiae on behalf of Intervener and Appellant. [9] Shield & Smith, Home & Clifford, Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown & Baerwitz, Horvitz...

Case Date: November 08, 1984

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

37 Cal.3d 174, 31484, Barme v. Wood

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 57 Cal.2d 57, 26484, Witt v. Jackson
California - 13 Cal.3d 804, 30277, Li v. Yellow Cab Co.
California - 19 Cal.3d 862, 30651, County of San Diego v. Sanfax Corp.
California - 2 Cal.3d 1, 29688, Helfend v. Southern Cal. Rapid Transit Dist.
California - 22 Cal.3d 829, 30693, Associated Construction & Engineering Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

See all quotations