369 N.E.2d 1211 (Ohio 1977), 76-980, Timken Co. v. Kosydar

Citation: 369 N.E.2d 1211, 52 Ohio St.2d 131

Opinion Judge: POTTER, J., of the Sixth Appellate District, sitting for LOCHER, J. Per Curiam.

Party Name: The TIMKEN COMPANY, Appellee, v. KOSYDAR, Tax Commr., Appellant.

Attorney: Day, Ketterer, Raley, Wright & Rybolt and John F. Buchman, Canton, for appellee. The Timken Company is engaged in two production operations: the manufacture of steel and the production of tapered roller bearings. The steel division manufactures bar and seamless tube steel for sale to the general ...

Judge Panel: C. WILLIAM O'NEILL, C. J., and HERBERT, CELEBREZZE, WILLIAM B. BROWN, PAUL W. BROWN, SWEENEY and POTTER, JJ., concur.

Case Date: December 07, 1977

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

369 N.E.2d 1211 (Ohio 1977), 76-980, Timken Co. v. Kosydar

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Ohio - 105 N.E.2d 648 (Ohio 1952), 32867, National Tube Co. v. Glander
Ohio - 116 N.E.2d 426 (Ohio 1953), 33546, Powhatan Min. Co. v. Peck
Ohio - 143 N.E.2d 710 (Ohio 1957), 35045, Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. Bowers
Ohio - 149 N.E.2d 1 (Ohio 1958), 35335, Youngstown Bldg. Material & Fuel Co. v. Bowers
Ohio - 159 N.E.2d 739 (Ohio 1959), 35913, General Motors Corp., Fisher Body Division v. Bowers

See all quotations