365 S.E.2d 22 (S.C. 1988), 22835, State v. Cockerham

Citation: 365 S.E.2d 22, 294 S.C. 380

Opinion Judge: Per Curiam:

Party Name: The STATE, Respondent, v. Harold Dean COCKERHAM, Appellant.

Attorney: John H. Blume, David I. Bruck, both of Bruck & Blume; S. C. Office of Appellate Defense, Columbia, Douglas Westbrook, Myrtle Beach, and Asst. Public Defender Jeffrey P. Bloom, Conway, for appellant. Atty. Gen. T. Travis Medlock, Asst. Atty. Gen. Harold M. Coombs, Jr., Columbia, and Solicitor Jame...

Case Date: Monday February 08, 1988

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

365 S.E.2d 22 (S.C. 1988), 22835, State v. Cockerham

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 416 U.S. 637 (1974), 72-1570, Donnelly v. DeChristoforo
Federal Cases - 426 U.S. 610 (1976), 75-5014, Doyle v. Ohio
South Carolina - 278 S.E.2d 335 (S.C. 1981), 21452, State v. Linder
South Carolina - 298 S.E.2d 92 (S.C. 1982), 21817, State v. Sloan
South Carolina - 350 S.E.2d 187 (S.C. 1986), 22621, State v. Arther

See all quotations