351 A.2d 389 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1976), Odar v. Chase Manhattan Bank

Citation: 351 A.2d 389, 138 N.J.Super. 464

Opinion Judge: [9] Bischoff

Party Name: Maria Antonieta ODAR, Administratrix ad Prosequendum and Administratrix of the Estate of Pedro Luis Odar, deceased; Ana Odar, an infant, by her Guardian ad Litem, Maria Antonieta Odar; and Maria Antonieta Odar, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, Trustee of the Estate of William Waldrich, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintif

Attorney: [6] Mr. William J. Pollinger argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. DeLorenzo & Pollinger, attorneys).

Case Date: January 28, 1976

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

351 A.2d 389 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1976), Odar v. Chase Manhattan Bank

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 127 A.2d 441 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1956), Nos. A--318, A--319, Cafone v. Spiniello Construction Co.
New Jersey - 132 A.2d 505 (N.J. 1957), A-127, Imre v. Riegel Paper Corp.
New Jersey - 136 A.2d 887 (N.J. 1957), A-33, Wytupeck v. City of Camden
New Jersey - 143 A.2d 521 (N.J. 1958), A--143, Simmel v. New Jersey Coop. Co.
New Jersey - 148 A.2d 830 (N.J. 1959), A--79, Egan v. Erie R. Co.

See all quotations