35 N.W. 346 (Wis. 1887), Magill v. Stoddard

Citation: 35 N.W. 346, 70 Wis. 75

Opinion Judge: HARLOW S. ORTON, J.

Party Name: MAGILL and another, Respondents, v. STODDARD, Appellant

Attorney: For the appellant there was a brief signed by Prentiss, Hughes & Miller, attorneys, and J. M. Morrow, of counsel, and the cause was argued orally by Mr. Morrow. For the respondents there was a brief by Fruit & Brindley, and oral argument by Mr. Fruit.

Case Date: November 22, 1887

Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court