35 Cal.App.4th 831, A064942, Greathouse v. Amcord, Inc.

Citation: 35 Cal.App.4th 831, 41 Cal.Rptr.2d 561

Opinion Judge: [12] Newsom

Party Name: Greathouse v. Amcord, Inc.

Attorney: [7] Philip A. Harley, Alan R. Brayton, Brayton, Gisvold & Harley, Novato, California. [8] Deborah F. Schweizer San Francisco, California. [9] Berry & Berry, Oakland, California For Plaintiffs/Respondents. [10] Kevin H. Louth, Craig Nelson, Liebman, Reiner, Nachison & Walsh, Los Angeles, Californi...

Case Date: June 07, 1995

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

35 Cal.App.4th 831, A064942, Greathouse v. Amcord, Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 792 F.Supp. 1189 (N.D.Cal. 1992), C 89-20290, In re Piper Aircraft
California - 3 Cal.2d 427, 15280, Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.
California - 54 Cal.3d 1041, S018678, Mitchell v. Gonzales
California - 227 Cal.App.3d 682, AO43516, Arbuthnot v. Relocation Realty Service Corp.
California - 19 Cal.App.4th 1475, D019194, Erreca's v. Superior Court

See all quotations