35 Cal.App.4th 1070, A062468, Stanley v. Richmond

Citation: 35 Cal.App.4th 1070, 41 Cal.Rptr.2d 768

Party Name: Stanley v. Richmond

Attorney: [7] Howard Moore, Jr., Moore & Moore, Oakland, California, for plaintiff and appellant. [8] Basil Plastiras, Plastiras & Forsblad, San Francisco, California, for defendants and respondents.

Case Date: Wednesday June 14, 1995

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

35 Cal.App.4th 1070, A062468, Stanley v. Richmond

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 528 F.2d 1384 (2nd Cir. 1976), 105, Cinema 5, Ltd. v. Cinerama, Inc.
California - 211 Cal. 113, L. A. 12475, Anderson v. Eaton
California - 13 Cal.3d 349, 7981, Smith v. Lewis
California - 32 Cal.3d 112, 24308, Campbell v. General Motors Corp.
California - 36 Cal.3d 830, 31840, Carson v. Facilities Development Co.

See all quotations