349 S.E.2d 89 (S.C.App. 1986), 0799, Glidden Coatings & Resins, Div. of SCM Corp. v. Suitt Const. Co., Inc.

Citation: 349 S.E.2d 89, 290 S.C. 240

Opinion Judge: BELL, Judge:

Party Name: GLIDDEN COATINGS & RESINS, a DIVISION OF SCM CORP., Appellant, v. SUITT CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., and Earl Cummins d/b/a Arrow Painting and Sandblasting, of whom Suitt Construction Co., Inc., is Respondent.

Attorney: Alexander S. Macaulay, of Miley & Macaulay, Walhalla, for appellant. Robert A. deHoll and James H. Watson, of Leatherwood, Walker, Todd & Mann, Greenville, for respondent.

Case Date: Monday September 22, 1986

Court: South Carolina Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

349 S.E.2d 89 (S.C.App. 1986), 0799, Glidden Coatings & Resins, Div. of SCM Corp. v. Suitt Const. Co., Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 20 Cal.3d 1, 30750, Post Bros. Constr. Co. v. Yoder
Oklahoma - 664 P.2d 396 (Okla. 1983), 57161, Anchor Concrete Co. v. Victor Sav. & Loan Ass'n
South Carolina - 346 S.E.2d 731 (S.C.App. 1986), 0755, Blackwell v. Blackwell
South Carolina - 349 S.E.2d 92 (S.C.App. 1986), 0800, Cox v. Cox
South Carolina - 92 S.E.2d 128 (S.C. 1956), 17134, City Lumber Co. v. National Sur. Corp.

See all quotations