34 Cal.App.4th 29, C017296, Lam v. Bureau of Security & Investigative Services

Citation: 34 Cal.App.4th 29, 40 Cal.Rptr.2d 137

Opinion Judge: [10] Sparks

Party Name: Lam v. Bureau of Security & Investigative Services

Attorney: [7] James Jay Seltzer and Timothy D. Murphy for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Robert L. Mukai, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Joel S. Primes, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and Arthur Taggart, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: March 23, 1995

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

34 Cal.App.4th 29, C017296, Lam v. Bureau of Security & Investigative Services

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 33 Cal.3d 897, 31649, In re Marriage of Modnick
California - 15 Cal.App.3d 531, 27718, Borror v. Department of Investment
California - 166 Cal.App.3d 1151, 23481, Brown v. State Personnel Bd.
California - 189 Cal.App.3d 1040, B010297, Kearl v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance
California - 203 Cal.App.3d 201, A036735, Roemer v. Pappas

See all quotations