332 A.2d 106 (Conn. 1973), Astarita v. Liquor Control Commission

Citation: 332 A.2d 106, 165 Conn. 185

Opinion Judge: MACDONALD, J.

Party Name: John O. ASTARITA v. LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION et al.

Attorney: Morton H. Greenblatt, Meriden, Asst. Corp. Counsel, for appellants (defendant city of Meriden and others)., Matthew J. Forstadt, Hartford, with whom, on the brief, was Irving S. Ribicoff, Hartford, for appellee (plaintiff)., Richard M. Sheridan, Asst. Atty. Gen., appeared for the named defendant ...

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other Judges concurred. Before HOUSE, CJ, and SHAPIRO, LOISELLE, MacDONALD and BOGDANSKI

Case Date: Wednesday June 20, 1973

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

332 A.2d 106 (Conn. 1973), Astarita v. Liquor Control Commission

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Hampshire - 108 A.2d 546 (N.H. 1954), Carrick v. Langtry
Connecticut - 107 A.2d 270 (Conn. 1954), State Water Com'n v. City of Norwich
Connecticut - 109 A.2d 362 (Conn. 1954), Spesa v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of New London
Connecticut - 115 A.2d 328 (Conn. 1955), Florentine v. Town of Darien
Connecticut - 186 A.2d 377 (Conn. 1962), Pascale v. Board of Zoning Appeals of City of New Haven

See all quotations