33 Cal.Rptr. 455, Civ. 27414, Rosemont v. Superior Court (Charles Turner)

Citation: 33 Cal.Rptr. 455

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: Rosemont v. Superior Court (Charles Turner)

Attorney: Kindel & Anderson, Los Angeles, and Bruce W. Sumner, Santa Ana, for petitioner. No appearance for respondent. McCutchen, Black, Harnagel & Shea, Los Angeles, for real party in interest.

Case Date: September 05, 1963

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

33 Cal.Rptr. 455, Civ. 27414, Rosemont v. Superior Court (Charles Turner)

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 16 Cal.2d 260, 17298, Hays v. Superior Court
California - 47 Cal.2d 483, 19553, Dowell v. Superior Court
California - 54 Cal.2d 318, 20384, Singer v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County
California - 56 Cal.2d 431, 26111, Carlson v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
California - 58 Cal.2d 166, 20975, Suezaki v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County

See all quotations