323 S.E.2d 797 (S.C.App. 1984), 0324, Epting v. Mayer

Citation: 323 S.E.2d 797, 283 S.C. 517

Opinion Judge: SHAW, Judge:

Party Name: Chloe EPTING, Respondent, v. Janie E. MAYER, E.E. Epting, Jessie E. Koon, Ruby E. Davis, Lucille E. Barrier, Mildred E. Davis, Elberta E. Metts and Ralph E. Epting, Defendants, of whom Mildred E. Davis, Ruby E. Davis, Jessie E. Koon, Lucille E. Barrier and Elberta E. Metts are Appellants.

Attorney: Eugene L. Brantley and Thomas B. Jackson, III of Brantley & Jackson, P. A., Columbia, for appellants. Joseph W. Hudgens of Pope & Hudgens, Newberry, for respondent.

Case Date: Wednesday November 28, 1984

Court: South Carolina Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

323 S.E.2d 797 (S.C.App. 1984), 0324, Epting v. Mayer

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Pennsylvania - 181 A. 500 (Pa. 1935), 7, Byrne's Estate
South Carolina - 86 S.E. 211 (S.C. 1915), 9187, Adams v. Verner
South Carolina - 42 S.E.2d 529 (S.C. 1947), 15944, Wates v. Fairfield Forest Products Co.
South Carolina - 56 S.E.2d 354 (S.C. 1949), 16281, Schroder v. Antipas
South Carolina - 70 S.E.2d 637 (S.C. 1952), 16603, Rogers v. Rogers

See all quotations