31 Cal.App.4th 471, B070279, Acosta v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist.

Citation: 31 Cal.App.4th 471, 37 Cal.Rptr.2d 171

Opinion Judge: [10] Johnson

Party Name: Acosta v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist.

Attorney: [7] Hamrick, Garrotto, Briskin & Pene and Katherine B. Pene and Frances K. Prince for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Sanford M. Gage and Peter I. Bersin for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Case Date: Tuesday January 10, 1995

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

31 Cal.App.4th 471, B070279, Acosta v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 19 Cal.2d 634, 18104, County of Los Angeles v. Frisbie
California - 2 Cal.3d 741, 29737, Dailey v. Los Angeles Unified Sch. Dist.
California - 22 Cal.3d 508, 30857, Hoyem v. Manhattan Beach City Sch. Dist.
California - 33 Cal.3d 699, 24385, Delta Farms Reclamation Dist. v. Superior Court
California - 35 Cal.3d 899, 31701, Hartzell v. Connell

See all quotations