31 Cal.App.4th 1304, B068266, Espinosa v. Little Co. of Mary Hospital

Citation: 31 Cal.App.4th 1304, 37 Cal.Rptr.2d 541

Opinion Judge: [10] Croskey

Party Name: Espinosa v. Little Co. of Mary Hospital

Attorney: [7] Lund & Caplan, Richard A. Caplan and Janice M. Corsino for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Rushfeldt, Shelley & Drake, Kathryn S. M. Mosely, Horvitz & Levy, David M. Axelrad, Mary F. Dant, Baker, Silberberg & Keener, Steven R. Van Sicklen and Natasha M. Riggs for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: January 30, 1995

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

31 Cal.App.4th 1304, B068266, Espinosa v. Little Co. of Mary Hospital

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 44 Cal.2d 225, 23300, Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.
California - 36 Cal.3d 210, 22557, People v. Caldwell
California - 36 Cal.3d 830, 31840, Carson v. Facilities Development Co.
California - 54 Cal.3d 1041, S018678, Mitchell v. Gonzales
California - 159 Cal.App.2d 231, 22619, Hughey v. Candoli

See all quotations