31 Cal.3d 545, 24239, Rumford v. City of Berkeley

Citation: 31 Cal.3d 545, 183 Cal.Rptr. 73, 645 P.2d 124

Opinion Judge: [12] Newman

Party Name: Rumford v. City of Berkeley

Attorney: [7] Ira G. Deitrick and Black & Deitrick for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Russell L. Richeda and Carroll, Burdick & McDonough as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants. [9] Theodore R. Lakey, Acting City Attorney, Natalie E. West, City Attorney, Richard E. Winnie and Charles O. Tri...

Case Date: Tuesday June 01, 1982

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

31 Cal.3d 545, 24239, Rumford v. City of Berkeley

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 410 U.S. 425 (1973), 72-686, Department of Motor Vehicles of California v. Rios
California - 183 Cal. 636, Crim. 2261, Ex parte Daniels
California - 20 Cal.2d 366, 18150, Pipoly v. Benson
California - 35 Cal.2d 870, 20902, Escobedo v. State of California
California - 4 Cal.2d 60, 14127, Simpson v. City of Los Angeles

See all quotations