31 Cal.3d 256, 31485, Shepard & Morgan v. Lee & Daniel, Inc.

Citation: 31 Cal.3d 256, 182 Cal.Rptr. 351, 643 P.2d 968

Opinion Judge: [10] Richardson

Party Name: Shepard & Morgan v. Lee & Daniel, Inc.

Attorney: [7] Murchison & Cumming, John A. McCaskey, Horvitz & Greines, Ellis J. Horvitz, Frederic D. Cohen and Michelle Van Cleave for Cross-complainant and Appellant. [8] Waters, McCluskey & Corcoran, Laurence R. Corcoran and Scott L. Thomas for Cross-defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: May 06, 1982

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

31 Cal.3d 256, 31485, Shepard & Morgan v. Lee & Daniel, Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 173 Cal. 270, S. F. 6663, Tanforan v. Tanforan
California - 13 Cal.3d 43, 30156, Bertero v. National General Corp.
California - 2 Cal.3d 575, 29715, Grudt v. City of Los Angeles
California - 20 Cal.3d 578, 30737, American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior Court
California - 21 Cal.3d 497, 30866, E. L. White, Inc. v. City of Huntington Beach

See all quotations