303 F.Supp.2d 356 (S.D.N.Y. 2003), 01 Civ. 10135, Arclightz and Films Pvt. Ltd. v. Video Palace Inc.

Citation: 303 F.Supp.2d 356

Party Name: ARCLIGHTZ AND FILMS PVT. LTD. and Enzo Pictures Ltd., Plaintiffs, v. VIDEO PALACE INC., "M. Pervez", Individually and d/b/a "Video Palace", Cinram International, Inc., Cinram Video Centre, the Amazing Video Centre, and John Does 1-20, Defendants.

Case Date: October 15, 2003

Court: U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

303 F.Supp.2d 356 (S.D.N.Y. 2003), 01 Civ. 10135, Arclightz and Films Pvt. Ltd. v. Video Palace Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

US Code - 17 U.S.C. § 504 Remedies For Infringement: Damages and Profits
US Code - 17 U.S.C. § 505 Remedies For Infringement: Costs and Attorney's Fees
US Code - 28 U.S.C. § 1920 Taxation of Costs
Federal Cases - Warner Bros., Inc. v. Dae Rim Trading, Inc.
Federal Cases - Matthew Bender & Co. v. West Publ'g

See all quotations