302 S.E.2d 856 (S.C. 1983), 21912, Windham v. Honeycutt

Citation: 302 S.E.2d 856, 279 S.C. 109

Opinion Judge: NESS, Justice:

Party Name: Stanley WINDHAM, Respondent-Appellant, v. Hazel M. HONEYCUTT, also known as Elizabeth Hazel Black Honeycutt, formerly known as Hazel M. Black, Appellant-Respondent.

Attorney: James R. Honeycutt, Fort Mill, for appellant-respondent. Hayes, Brunson & Gatlin, Rock Hill, for respondent-appellant.

Case Date: Tuesday May 03, 1983

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

302 S.E.2d 856 (S.C. 1983), 21912, Windham v. Honeycutt

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 147 S.E.2d 692 (S.C. 1966), 18488, Lipscomb v. Poole
South Carolina - 211 S.E.2d 228 (S.C. 1975), 19939, Conran v. Yager
South Carolina - 299 S.E.2d 337 (S.C. 1983), 21848, Rosamond Enterprises, Inc. v. McGranahan
South Carolina - 300 S.E.2d 289 (S.C. 1983), 21859, American Hardware Supply Co., Inc. v. Whitmire
South Carolina - 302 S.E.2d 856 (S.C. 1983), 21913, Bridwell v. Bridwell