30 Cal.App.3d 1, 30895, Mahoney v. San Francisco City etc. Employees' Ret. Bd.

Citation: 30 Cal.App.3d 1, 106 Cal.Rptr. 94

Opinion Judge: [10] Elkington

Party Name: Mahoney v. San Francisco City etc. Employees' Ret. Bd.

Attorney: [7] Davis, Cowell & Bowe and Philip Paul Bowe for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Thomas M. O'Connor, City Attorney, and Donald J. Garibaldi, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: Wednesday January 17, 1973

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

30 Cal.App.3d 1, 30895, Mahoney v. San Francisco City etc. Employees' Ret. Bd.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 23 Cal.2d 303, 16947, Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals
California - 33 Cal.2d 867, 6007, Swars v. Council of City of Vallejo
California - 39 Cal.2d 260, 22232, Fascination, Inc. v. Hoover
California - 44 Cal.2d 90, 23083, Temescal Water Co. v. Dept. Public Works
California - 46 Cal.2d 132, 23659, Bailey v. County of Los Angeles

See all quotations