30 A.2d 919 (Conn. 1943), Richardson v. Pratt & Whitney Mfg. Co.

Citation: 30 A.2d 919, 129 Conn. 669

Opinion Judge: DICKENSON, Judge.

Party Name: RICHARDSON v. PRATT & WHITNEY MFG. CO. et al.

Attorney: Julius B. Schatz and Arthur D. Weinstein, both of Hartford (Edward Seltzer, of Hartford, on the brief), for appellant. Harold K. Watrous, of Hartford (Daniel G. Campion, of Hartford, on the brief), for appellees.

Judge Panel: In this opinion the other Judges concurred. Before MALTBIE, C.J., and BROWN, JENNINGS, ELLS, and DICKENSON, JJ.

Case Date: February 26, 1943

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

30 A.2d 919 (Conn. 1943), Richardson v. Pratt & Whitney Mfg. Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 140 A. 114 (Conn. 1927), McCulloch v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.
Connecticut - 163 A. 413 (Conn. 1932), Witkowski v. Goldberg
Connecticut - 18 A.2d 373 (Conn. 1941), Baktis v. Sidney Blumenthal & Co.
Connecticut - 21 A.2d 402 (Conn. 1941), Orlo v. Connecticut Co.
Connecticut - 29 A.2d 772 (Conn. 1942), Jones v. Town of Hamden