3 S.W. 766 (Tex.App. 1886), Patillo v. State

Citation: 3 S.W. 766, 22 Tex.App. 586

Opinion Judge: WHITE, P.J.

Party Name: PATILLO v. STATE. [1]

Attorney: [22 Tex.App. 592] Lockett & Lockett, J. A. Martin, and Flint, Anderson & Anderson, for appellant. Asst. Atty. Gen. Burts, for the State.

Judge Panel: HURT, J., has doubts about the distinction made between the rule as to communicated and uncommunicated threats.

Case Date: December 15, 1886

Court: Texas Court of Appeals