3 S.W. 684 (Tex.App. 1886), Smith v. State

Citation: 3 S.W. 684, 22 Tex.App. 316

Opinion Judge: WILLSON, J.

Party Name: SMITH v. STATE. [1])

Attorney: [22 Tex.App. 321] Stanley Welch and E. J. Hamner, for appellant, contending that the proof on the part of the defense filled the measure of the burden of proof to establish insanity, fixed by law upon the defendant, and that, therefore, the verdict was against the evidence. Asst. Atty. Gen. Burts...

Case Date: November 17, 1886

Court: Texas Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

3 S.W. 684 (Tex.App. 1886), Smith v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Texas - 14 Tex.App. 645 (Tex.Ct.App. 1883), 1570, Davis v. State
Texas - 15 Tex.App. 139 (Tex.Ct.App. 1883), 1497, Smith v. State
Texas - 18 Tex.App. 401 (Tex.Ct.App. 1885), 3392, Lewis v. State
Texas - 19 Tex.App. 158 (Tex.Ct.App. 1885), 2043, Phillips v. State
Texas - 19 Tex.App. 176 (Tex.Ct.App. 1885), 1890, Walker v. State

See all quotations