3 S.E.2d 527 (W.Va. 1939), 8876, Osborne v. Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co.

Citation: 3 S.E.2d 527, 121 W.Va. 357

Opinion Judge: RILEY, Judge.

Party Name: OSBORNE v. CHESAPEAKE & POTOMAC TELEPHONE CO.

Attorney: Peyton, Winters & Hereford, of Huntington, and Lilly & Lilly, of Charleston, for plaintiff in error., Frederick L. Thomas and Price, Smith & Spilman, all of Charleston, and C. W. Strickling and Fitzpatrick, Brown & Davis, all of Huntington, for defendant in error. Peyton, Winters & Hereford, of ...

Case Date: Tuesday June 13, 1939

Court: Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

3 S.E.2d 527 (W.Va. 1939), 8876, Osborne v. Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

West Virginia - 14 S.E. 465 (W.Va. 1892), Gunn v. Ohio River R. Co.
West Virginia - 18 S.E. 782 (W.Va. 1893), Poling v. Ohio River R. Co.
West Virginia - 3 S.E.2d 450 (W.Va. 1939), 8898, Buskirk v. Bankers Finance Corp.
West Virginia - 17 W.Va. 190 (W.Va. 1880), Washington v. Baltimore & O. R. R. Co.

3 S.E.2d 527 (W.Va. 1939), 8876, Osborne v. Chesapeake &amp; Potomac Tel. Co.

3 S.E.2d 527 (W.Va. 1939), 8876, Osborne v. Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co.