296 N.E.2d 266 (Ohio 1973), 72-321, Houk v. Ross

Citation: 296 N.E.2d 266, 34 Ohio St.2d 77

Opinion Judge: CORRIGAN, J.

Party Name: HOUK et al., Appellees, v. ROSS, Appellant.

Attorney: residence purposes only'-must be construed so as to prohibit only the construction of more than one building on each of said lots and the use of the lots for other that residence purposes, and such restrictions do not prohibit the construction of a multiple-family dwelling or residence., The prop...

Judge Panel: C. WILLIAM O'NEILL, C. J., and HERBERT, STERN, CELEBREZZE, WILLIAM B. BROWN and PAUL W. BROWN, JJ., concur.

Case Date: May 02, 1973

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

296 N.E.2d 266 (Ohio 1973), 72-321, Houk v. Ross

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 290 F.2d 246 (2nd Cir. 1961), 80, First Nat. Bank in Yonkers v. Maryland Cas. Co.
Federal Cases - 291 F.2d 496 (2nd Cir. 1961), 315, Local 33, Intern. Hod Carriers Bldg. and Common Laborers' Union of America v. Mason Tenders Dist. Council of Greater New York
Federal Cases - 312 F.2d 181 (2nd Cir. 1962), 61, Procter & Gamble Independent Union of Port Ivory, New York v. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co.
Federal Cases - 326 F.2d 916 (2nd Cir. 1964), 208 Docket 28471, International Longshoremen's Ass'n, AFL-CIO v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.
Federal Cases - 328 F.2d 381 (2nd Cir. 1964), 164, Local 12298, Dist. 50, United Mine Workers of America v. Bridgeport Gas Co.

See all quotations