29 Cal.App.3d 797, 40359, Mize v. Crail

Citation: 29 Cal.App.3d 797, 106 Cal.Rptr. 34

Opinion Judge: [10] The Court

Party Name: Mize v. Crail

Attorney: [7] John D. Maharg, County Counsel, Henry W. Gardett and Douglas C. Miller, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Hill, Farrer & Burrill and William McD. Miller for Defendants and Appellants. [9] Hahn, Cazier, Thornton, Hoegh & Leff, Dennis B. Haase, Julian A. Pollok and Albert ...

Case Date: Thursday January 04, 1973

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

29 Cal.App.3d 797, 40359, Mize v. Crail

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 146 Cal. 590, L. A. 1636, County of Los Angeles v. Kellogg
California - 23 Cal.2d 862, 18899, Guardianship of Gilman
California - 5 Cal.2d 588, 15302, Estate of Miller
California - 7 Cal.App. 1, Civ. 333, Davey v. Mulroy
California - 249 Cal.App.2d 767, 8226, Leoke v. San Bernardino County

See all quotations